PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130423 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Aug 07 '18 at 21:52 |
Run Duration | 205 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7870-$203
Sapphire(174B E217) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
CHN 25SATA02M 256 256GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1126K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 164 155 162 166 164 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$53
174GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 117 115 114 114 MB/s
|
60.2%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
122GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 48 49 49 49 50 MB/s
|
24.7%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
43GB free
Firmware: 0604
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 126 124 127 128 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
39.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 267x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 184x |
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 134x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 64x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 49x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $175 |