Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 01:27
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 392
51% 385 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 31.7
20% 27 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 25.3
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 28 14 24 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Read 395
Write 23.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 25.5
25% 118 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 22.3
4K Mixed 0.1
44% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 89
DQ Mixed 0.2
36% 89 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
386GB free
Firmware: GG2OAC90
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 98 98 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 96.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 97
60% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
SONY WALKMAN 13GB
12GB free, PID 0c71
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 31.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 23.7
36% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 5.2
445% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F2G64CB88G4N-CG 830B M2F2G64CB88G4N-CG 830B M2P2G64CB8HC9N-DG 06C1 SLZ3128M8-EDJ1F 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.7% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.3
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback