Toshiba Satellite C75D-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite C75D-C  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA ARACL
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '18 at 17:10
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 36.8
2-Core 73.9
37% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 130
18% 131 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Toshiba(1179 F835) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1005.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.36% Terrible
Lighting 2.73
Reflection 5.62
Parallax 3.62
2% 3.99 fps
MRender 3.19
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 3.65
3% 3.14 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.36%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 354 347 374 374 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
73% Very good
Read 339
Write 392
Mixed 276
SusWrite 362
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 28.3
95% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 155
123% 168 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF186DJ.M8F Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1866, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.3% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.3
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.2
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback