Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 160 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 362 39% 310 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% EVGA(3842 2753) CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 398.98 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 18 Parallax 18.9 18% 19.8 fps	MRender 25.9 Gravity 21.2 Splatting 18.9 18% 22 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,545 Write 3,746 Mixed 3,547 809% 3613 MB/s	4K Read 277 4K Write 150 4K Mixed 33.5 542% 154 MB/s	DQ Read 70.5 DQ Write 439 DQ Mixed 489 308% 333 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 105GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 96 96 96 95 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 96 Write 82.2 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 94.9 62% 84.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 212% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 16.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9.3 SC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16