| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus X99-M WS/SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180626 |
| Uptime | 1.4 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 24 '18 at 16:35 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
83.7%
Excellent
|
81% 143 Pts
|
66% 522 Pts
|
37% 602 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.33
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.2%
Below average
|
22% 66.7 fps
|
72% 87.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 369 369 370 370 371 MB/s
|
118%
Outstanding
|
115% 513 MB/s
|
157% 55.8 MB/s
|
369% 515 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Micro 1GB
1GB free, PID 5151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.1 5.2 MB/s
|
4.93%
Terrible
|
9% 8.12 MB/s
|
18% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9965600-033.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
69.4%
Good
|
72% 25.3 GB/s
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
57% 70.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 12x |
| Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 10x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 5x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $615 |