Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100 29,222 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	Memory 83.7 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 92.4 50% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 165 8-Core 232 25% 198 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 1341) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.46 Parallax 1.56 1% 1.44 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.3 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 70 59 51 57 59 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.9% Poor	Read 203 Write 68.3 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 58.3 19% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 17.6 55% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 19.1 DQ Write 23.1 DQ Mixed 20.5 16% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38.2% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 12.5 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9 24% 8.4 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	20x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	18x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16