| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Asus CM6850 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK CM6850 |
| Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111221 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 31 '18 at 16:33 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
74.6%
Very good
|
70% 116 Pts
|
44% 328 Pts
|
20% 327 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1420 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.2
|
56.1%
Above average
|
55% 77.2 fps
|
59% 70.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 114 120 128 133 146 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
86% 117 MB/s
|
212% 1.6 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
25GB free
Firmware: 1AC0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 99 101 107 105 MB/s
|
61.8%
Good
|
72% 98.1 MB/s
|
196% 1.4 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
54.1%
Above average
|
53% 18.5 GB/s
|
45% 15.8 GB/s
|
64% 62.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CM6850 Builds (Compare 123 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus CM6850
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 97x |
| Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples | 10x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 11x |
| GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples | 9x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $228 |