Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '16 at 12:31
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 167
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 325
44% 327 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84F6) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6472
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.47
4% 4.25 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 431
Write 351
Mixed 315
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 22.3
106% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 43
DQ Write 86.2
DQ Mixed 24
30% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 124%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0117
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 29.1
Mixed 31.6
24% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.25
88% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
767GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 79.3
Write 75.6
Mixed 20.6
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.13
4K Mixed 0.05
10% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 59%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
125GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 54.7
Mixed 20.3
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.24
81% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 49%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
24GB free
Firmware: 0117
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 28
Mixed 30.3
23% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.21
70% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.9% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 19
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-HD3 Builds (Compare 485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-HD3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $525
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback