Asrock X470 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 83% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 75% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X470 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	6.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 06 '18 at 02:20
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 120 2-Core 243 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 694 73% 586 Pts	64-Core 965 60% 965 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C300) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Lighting 125 Reflection 137 Parallax 129 102% 130 fps	MRender 96.5 Gravity 122 Splatting 102 87% 107 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 502 Write 487 Mixed 380 102% 456 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 58.8 197% 69.5 MB/s	DQ Read 383 DQ Write 360 DQ Mixed 369 277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79 6,615 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 31GB free Firmware: 3.CHN SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 50 48 51 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 45.7 Write 44.5 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 49.3 32% 43.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 44%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0848GZBPKF 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 481GB free Firmware: GKAOAC5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 13 12 13 11 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.27% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 15 Mixed 15.5 SusWrite 12.5 10% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.27% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$171 37,802 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 34 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 28.3 86% 30.2 GB/s	Latency 79.5 50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 46%

Yacht

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	121x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	55x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	44x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	27x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	23x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	16x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	13x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	25x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	16x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16