Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds)
Memory	2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141125
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '18 at 07:46
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8370-$175 34,720 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Memory 45.2 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 139 47% 85.2 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 397 40% 325 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	19.2% Very poor	Lighting 0.37 Reflection 75.7 Parallax 65 0% 47 fps	MRender 66.4 Gravity 69.2 Splatting 68.7 56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PH4-CE120 120GB 793 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: F/W:1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 44 2.3 24 13 2.8 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	14.7% Very poor	Read 96.5 Write 90.5 Mixed 76 SusWrite 15.6 16% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 0.4 34% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 0.2 DQ Write 41.3 DQ Mixed 18.6 15% 20 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 82%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 37 113 108 122 107 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 114 Write 68.3 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 101 62% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.2 89% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 108%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 205GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 73 72 73 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 55.5 Write 57.7 Mixed 39.2 SusWrite 72.7 77% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	531x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	263x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	254x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	157x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	93x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	82x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	62x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	446x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	259x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	222x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16