Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	22.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 81.1 1-Core 58.3 2-Core 97.9 51% 79.1 Pts	4-Core 198 8-Core 248 29% 223 Pts	64-Core 259 16% 259 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XFX(1682 9470) CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	14.9% Very poor	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 62.9 Parallax 65.6 0% 42.9 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 46.5 Splatting 51.7 44% 53.9 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 88 38 76 52 103 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.7% Poor	Read 111 Write 57.9 Mixed 20 SusWrite 72 14% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 0.1 41% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 133 DQ Write 2.3 DQ Mixed 0.1 17% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 86%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 233GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 77 78 77 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 78.2 Write 76.8 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 77.1 53% 71.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	40.2% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 13.4 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 11.5 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 78.6 51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	72x
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	42x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	40x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $193

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16