PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME X299-A (all builds) |
Memory | 44.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170808 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 16 '18 at 11:52 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-7900X-$400
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
82.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 55 81 93 102 MB/s
|
60.6%
Good
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
457GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 103 63 83 97 104 MB/s
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
1.5TB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 102 63 83 97 104 MB/s
|
76.2%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$33
242GB free
Firmware: MS2OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 101 47 70 91 102 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7800XIntel $236Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 372x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 214x |
Core i9-7900XIntel $400Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 148x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 192x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 90x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 82x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $819 |