Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 9 (all builds)
Memory	16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170210
Uptime	19.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '18 at 06:03
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 92.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 257 92% 163 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 753 74% 608 Pts	64-Core 765 47% 765 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 377E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 139 Reflection 146 Parallax 137 113% 141 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 137 Splatting 107 96% 118 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 374 307 295 287 283 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 471 Mixed 397 SusWrite 334 94% 418 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 56.4 203% 75.2 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 361 271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 525GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 154 145 151 156 156 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 178 Mixed 81 SusWrite 152 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 114%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 31GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 7.3 9.5 9.1 8.9 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.11% Terrible	Read 39.8 Write 27.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 8.4 23% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 30% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.11% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x16GB 489 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.7% Very good	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 28.1 MC Mixed 21.6 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 22.6 62% 21.8 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 109%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 108%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	6x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	5x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 2,149 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 82%, 3,198 samples	3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 96%, 2,357 samples	3x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $865

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16