PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A34 |
Motherboard | MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180724 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Oct 14 '18 at 12:04 |
Run Duration | 204 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64.7%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
|
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 147 145 144 138 134 MB/s
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
781GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 85 83 87 85 MB/s
|
54.3%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
202GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 2.8 1.9 2.7 3.3 MB/s
|
24.5%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
326GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 177 176 179 179 180 MB/s
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
|||
39.7%
Below average
|
||||
Hitachi HUS 726040ALE614 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: APGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 132 131 131 132 131 MB/s
|
92.6%
Outstanding
|
|||
External USB3.0 500GB
202GB free, PID 0578
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 56 57 57 58 MB/s
|
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
75.8%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 817x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 339x |
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 269x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 326x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 265x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 200x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $459 |