Acer Aspire M3400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M3400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3400
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 17 '16 at 09:19
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 80.5
44% 66.1 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 212
23% 182 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841E) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6200
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26% Poor
Lighting 32.6
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 38.2
27% 33.6 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 25.4
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
6GB free
Firmware: X312
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 200
Write 76.6
Mixed 98.6
27% 125 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 11.5
72% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 7.86
18% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 93%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
826GB free
Firmware: 01.0
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 94
Mixed 90.5
73% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.18
48% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 96.9
79% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.37
4K Mixed 0.18
52% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
665GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 93.7
Mixed 90.7
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.45
4K Mixed 0.29
115% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.1% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 12
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3400 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback