PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3358-A1 |
Memory | 59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150402 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 22 '16 at 11:33 |
Run Duration | 202 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
|
46.4%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4817
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
381%
Outstanding
|
||||
202%
Outstanding
|
||||
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
201%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Contour 16GB
3GB free, PID 540e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
9.75%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
58.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples | 10x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 3x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 5x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $237 |