Panasonic CF-53AACZYDE

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8.01GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Panasonic CF-53AACZYDE (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CF53-1
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8.00781 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110712
Uptime	54.7 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '16 at 10:02
Run Duration	404 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	31% Below average	Memory 40.7 1-Core 26.1 2-Core 57.9 26% 41.6 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 135 17% 129 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(10F7 8338) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 1.31 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 1 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1322 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1043 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 52 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 676 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7477316409	38.5% Below average	Read 162 Write 90.1 Mixed 106 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 20.7 4K Mixed 19.5 70% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 45.7 DQ Mixed 50.7 53% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 126%
KODAK PIXPRO SP360 4K 64GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 44GB free, PID 0425 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.7% Very poor	Read 17.1 Write 10.8 Mixed 13.5 17% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.29 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 1.29 112% 2.08 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 11%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB 6,219 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 14GB free, PID 556b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	5.87% Terrible	Read 23.4 Write 3.87 Mixed 7.43 11% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.47 4K Write 0.19 4K Mixed 1.21 64% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.87% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 48GB 2,786 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 40960 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 19.7 MC Mixed 17.9 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CF-53AACZYDE Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Panasonic CF-53AACZYDE

CPU
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

RAM
48GBUnknownBench 49%, 2,786 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $34

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Panasonic CF-53AACZYDE

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Panasonic CF-53AACZYDE

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)