| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | Dell Precision T7600 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T7600 (all builds) |
| Memory | 119.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140929 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 30 '16 at 10:41 |
| Run Duration | 87 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
|
76.6%
Very good
|
70% 122 Pts
|
65% 548 Pts
|
114% 1,848 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro 6000
HP(103C 076F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6886
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
15% 23.1 fps
|
19% 22.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 750 500GB
450GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53.8%
Above average
|
58% 258 MB/s
|
88% 29.9 MB/s
|
19% 30.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70BH0-YK0 8x16GB
8 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
96.4%
Outstanding
|
111% 39 GB/s
|
27% 9.6 GB/s
|
54% 74.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 692 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 91x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 76x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples | 75x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 36x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $109 |