Lenovo 30A7000QUS

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Lenovo 30A7000QUS (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	30 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150923
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '16 at 20:23
Run Duration	87 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 209 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 407 8-Core 570 62% 489 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5467 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.7 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 19 18% 19.4 fps	MRender 23.5 Gravity 20 Splatting 16.1 16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 17%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 634 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 459 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 64 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 7 (F1) Unknown 99 99 958607779	87.1% Excellent	Read 508 Write 409 Mixed 419 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 59.2 4K Mixed 36.9 127% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32.4 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 101 63% 68 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GB 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.5% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 23.5 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 21 54% 19 GB/s	Latency 65.7 61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 30A7000QUS Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Lenovo 30A7000QUS

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	18x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	3x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples	8x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	7x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	8x
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	3x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	2x

RAM
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 4x16GBHynixBench 98%, 859 samples	3x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 6x16GBHynixBench 93%, 48 samples	3x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 3x16GBMicronBench 73%, 28 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 10% - Very poor

Total price: $863

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16