Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110901
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '15 at 23:51
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 187
64% 141 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 521
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 590 (SLI Disabled)
Asus(1043 83A3) 1.5GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4752
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18.1% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 24.6
18% 26.8 fps
MRender 25
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 24.8
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB-$109
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JTRA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 269
Write 179
Mixed 208
48% 219 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 15.9
70% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 42.9
DQ Mixed 15.5
16% 26.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 168
Mixed 171
134% 179 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.23
91% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Typical GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 940 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback