Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	99.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151023
Uptime	3.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '16 at 07:20
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 193 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 345 46% 346 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 2962) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.6909 Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	32.1% Below average	Lighting 41.7 Reflection 39.2 Parallax 35 34% 38.7 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 35.8 Splatting 31.8 28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8330 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 804 (B1) Unknown 97 97 60 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 7 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11171343873	99.7% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 398 Mixed 414 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 82 4K Mixed 36.9 142% 50.9 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 95.6 118% 211 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 124%
Seagate ST750LM022 HN-M750MBB 750GB 31,958 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 371GB free Firmware: 2BA30001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 92 92 2523 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2700 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 758 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 328 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 60 171799609367 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 65 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 52 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 15709	48.2% Average	Read 81.1 Write 86.6 Mixed 83 63% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.36 95% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 48.2% Great: 57%
WD WD8088AADS-00M2B0 809GB 695 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 208GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 116 111 7158 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14570 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 34 34 48540 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1609 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 101 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 699965 (C2) HDA temperature 118 106 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 100 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 165 0	32.2% Below average	Read 55.5 Write 56.3 Mixed 57.2 42% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.52 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.M8FA 1x8GB 831 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.2% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 10.4 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.6 28% 9.87 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	588x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	459x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	457x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	557x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	394x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	240x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	191x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	132x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	121x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	91x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	88x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $435

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16