Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '16 at 13:49
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 141 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 406 41% 334 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% MSI(1462 2015) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.155.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	60.4% Good	Lighting 75.5 Reflection 64.4 Parallax 86.5 62% 75.5 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 82.1 58% 69.3 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193 568 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 19069063 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 16 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 102117142443335 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2598 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 407 (B1) Unknown 0 0 6 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 4127 (BD) vendor-specific 25 72 42954391577 (C2) HDA temperature 25 72 42954391577 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 19069063 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 19069063 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 19069063 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 20906 (EA) Unknown 0 0 21810 (F1) Unknown 0 0 21810 (F2) Unknown 0 0 21562	50% Above average	Read 465 Write 148 Mixed 219 60% 277 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 54.4 4K Mixed 12 71% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 16.7 DQ Write 55.9 DQ Mixed 10.4 15% 27.6 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 91%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$109 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 174 5733 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1498 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 6608 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1167 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 189 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2751 (C2) HDA temperature 119 104 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	64.7% Good	Read 116 Write 109 Mixed 98.4 81% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.2 81% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 88%
Samsung HD105SI 1TB 5,813 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 144GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 75 75 7736 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7321 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 16906 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4572 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 62 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 44 240518758427 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 574 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 74 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 2 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7420	55.8% Above average	Read 79 Write 115 Mixed 59.5 63% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.31 89% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 55.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB 2,772 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.9% Above average	MC Read 22.3 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 18.4 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 14.6 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16