Asus G20AJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G20AJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20AJ
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '16 at 17:48
Run Duration792 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 221
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 644
64% 522 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
Asus(1043 862C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6881
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 13.7
Parallax 10.1
12% 12.7 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 14.2
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 453
Write 125
Mixed 166
54% 248 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 12
95% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 20.7
66% 148 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 114%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
823GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 165
Write 148
Mixed 173
123% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.18
73% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 128GB
63GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Read 20.9
Write 3.64
Mixed 8.55
11% 11 MB/s
4K Read 4.21
4K Write 0.36
4K Mixed 1.43
76% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 16%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 20.3
Mixed 17.1
28% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.95
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.86
71% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 86%
JetFlash Transcend 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Read 38.4
Write 4.86
Mixed 7.98
15% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.73
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
29% 2.58 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 16%
HP Photosmart C309a 8GB
2GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
2.21% Terrible
Read 7.6
Write 3.36
Mixed 4.43
6% 5.13 MB/s
4K Read 1.52
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.005
6% 0.51 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20AJ Builds (Compare 952 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20AJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $255
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback