Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory244.8 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160622
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '16 at 10:57
Run Duration537 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34% Below average
SC Int 27.4
SC Float 28
SC Mixed 27.9
22% 27.8 Pts
QC Int 119
QC Float 126
QC Mixed 132
28% 126 Pts
MC Int 846
MC Float 905
MC Mixed 897
132% 883 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 34%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$1,096
Gigabyte(1458 36DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 375.70
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 187
Parallax 355
76% 241 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 316
Splatting 202
104% 239 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 116%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
4KALIGNED
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 874
Write 834
Mixed 913
196% 874 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 13.6
44% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 82
DQ Write 92.5
DQ Mixed 48.7
47% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 158%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 837
Write 826
Mixed 895
191% 853 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 13.8
45% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 95.5
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 37.7
43% 73.7 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 102%
Great: 158%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 10TB (2016)-$367
9.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 207
Mixed 208
157% 208 MB/s
4K Read 7.14
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.33
347% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 120%
Great: 122%
Hitachi HDS72404 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO
4KALIGNED
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 154
Mixed 136
114% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 0.62
4K Mixed 0.22
74% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 124
Write 125
Mixed 119
92% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.18
4K Mixed 0.24
108% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 93%
WD Red Pro 4TB (2014)-$229
3.5TB free
Firmware: 81.0
4KALIGNED
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 175
Mixed 169
138% 184 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 2.46
4K Mixed 0.34
117% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 110%
Great: 107%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 123
Write 125
Mixed 125
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.24
106% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 124
Write 119
Mixed 113
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.03
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.24
99% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72% Very good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 122
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.25
115% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72%
Great: 93%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$134
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.0
4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 147
Write 137
Mixed 138
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.52
4K Mixed 0.16
61% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 100
Write 116
Mixed 115
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.23
97% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS724040AL 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO
4KALIGNED
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 158
Mixed 138
114% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 0.58
4K Mixed 0.23
72% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
3TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 114
Write 105
Mixed 109
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.24
104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
3TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 115
Write 102
Mixed 102
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.25
110% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 93%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$173
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAO Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 113
85% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.22
102% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 224 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $863
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $299Nvidia GTX 1070 $386Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $508Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $230Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $265Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $158SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $920SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback