1aegh 1AEGHA52

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	1aegh 1AEGHA52 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAPPHIRE PURE BLACK X58
Memory	19.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110928
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '16 at 21:45
Run Duration	259 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	20%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 69.9 2-Core 134 62% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 326 35% 280 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.11.4 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 82 53% 72.3 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 62.8 Splatting 57.3 51% 63.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 21024685 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -122329258504819 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 814 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 222 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21024685 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21024685 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21024685 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13806 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5684 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5684 (F2) Unknown 0 0 7910	50.2% Above average	Read 353 Write 108 Mixed 149 44% 204 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 14.7 76% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 32.9 58% 116 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 311GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 137 4033 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1303 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 26174 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1288 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 224 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1078 (C2) HDA temperature 109 95 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6064 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.5% Average	Read 88 Write 80.8 Mixed 17.5 45% 62.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.21 65% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 69%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 589GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 143 8758 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1118 (05) Reallocated sector count 199 199 15 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 19823 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1101 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 460 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 792016 (C2) HDA temperature 123 107 29 (C4) Reallocation count 199 199 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 199 199 640 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 199 199 639 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 198 198 643	36.2% Below average	Read 63.8 Write 62 Mixed 5.82 32% 43.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.15 73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 195GB free Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 210492385 (03) Spinup time 95 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3997 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 200858085 (09) Power-on hours count 65 65 31224 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1341 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 8590065666 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 70 55 504889374 (C2) HDA temperature 30 45 55834574878 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 17 210492385 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 10368051087910 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3145479922 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3807702288	38% Below average	Read 60 Write 72.2 Mixed 33.3 41% 55.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.34 79% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 68%
Seagate ST3300822AS 300GB 441 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 129GB free Firmware: 3.AHH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 97 89 24398377 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2861 (05) Reallocated sector count 97 97 140 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 397347505 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 47866 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2173 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 26266 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 50 176682434595 (C2) HDA temperature 35 50 47244640291 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 58 48 110748610 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 114 231209 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	33% Below average	Read 58.1 Write 57.1 Mixed 24.1 34% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 0.75 4K Mixed 0.26 56% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 37%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 2.5TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 119 Write 117 Mixed 76.4 130% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.17 75% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-478.A00LF 9905403-478.A00LF KHX1866C9D3/4GX KHX1866C9D3/4GX 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.2% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 11.9 MC Mixed 14.8 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 10.5 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

1aegh 1AEGHA52

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)