Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '16 at 20:40
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 3,842 User benchmarks, average bench 83% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 85.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 190 73% 126 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 768 70% 590 Pts	64-Core 972 60% 972 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Dell(1028 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 361.91 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Lighting 29.3 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 27.4 24% 29 fps	MRender 26.9 Gravity 27.1 Splatting 27.7 22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung SM87 512GB 206 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 333GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 13 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 2529 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 90232947 (F2) Unknown 99 99 27354914	44.8% Average	Read 454 Write 427 Mixed 404 96% 428 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 0.66 4K Mixed 0.47 2% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 118%
Samsung Flash Drive 16GB 880 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 6GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	8.7% Terrible	Read 32.7 Write 8.05 Mixed 8.87 16% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.35 4K Write 0.46 4K Mixed 0.64 50% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.7% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GR7MFR8N-UH 4x16GB 188 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB RIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 52.6 MC Mixed 43.8 131% 46 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 13.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 128%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	414x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	385x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	286x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	347x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	208x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16