Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	257% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 1,038 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 157 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 628 56% 471 Pts	64-Core 1,709 106% 1,709 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 2,240 Write 1,457 Mixed 1,586 390% 1,761 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 146 4K Mixed 40.5 195% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 505 DQ Write 396 DQ Mixed 196 216% 366 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 283%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 28.9 Mixed 30.4 39% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C15 8x16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 58.7 MC Write 44.8 MC Mixed 47.2 144% 50.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 16.2 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 170%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 98%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	20x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	11x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x

RAM
M393A1K43DB2-CWE 8x8GBSamsungBench 146%, 50 samples	6x
SP008GXLZU320BSA 4x8GBSilicon-PowerBench 99%, 50 samples	6x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 1,230 samples	5x

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $770

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16