Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 94% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF (all builds)
Memory	14.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130429
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '17 at 15:20
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.6 GHz, turbo 6.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 98.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 254 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 505 8-Core 508 68% 507 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2327 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 126 Parallax 124 101% 125 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 112 Splatting 111 92% 113 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB 11,317 User benchmarks, average bench 264% 273GB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 522 Write 183 Mixed 255 70% 320 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 27.7 103% 36.7 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 50.4 89% 179 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 445%
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11148 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2414 (B1) Unknown 99 99 48 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 57 40 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1098 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12546193506	105% Outstanding	Read 525 Write 449 Mixed 470 107% 481 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 37 129% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 135 165% 290 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 119%
Crucial_ CT128MX10 59GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 31GB free Firmware: MU02 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Read 522 Write 183 Mixed 262 70% 322 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 25.8 100% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 41.4 64% 119 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 70%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: FP1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 8997 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2405 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 13232 (0A) Spinup retry count 148 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2402 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 73 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 950 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 7071 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231929020463 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 71 71 11798 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 205 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	104% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 165 Mixed 156 129% 172 MB/s	4K Read 4.33 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.32 259% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 88GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 75.6 Write 69.7 Mixed 75 94% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.23 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 0.16 80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB 24,592 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 27.4 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 24.3 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 43.1 93% 43.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	86x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	46x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	22x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	22x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	17x

SSD
MZ7KM960HMJP0D3 960GBBench 99%, 133 samples	27x
MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 3,736 samples	11x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
CMX4GX3M2A1600C7 029E CM3X2G1600C8 029E CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 029E CM3X2G1600C8 8GBUnknownBench 60%, 17 samples	17x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	5x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16