| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A78LT-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100824 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 10 '17 at 11:43 |
| Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.1%
Good
|
52% 77.6 Pts
|
25% 186 Pts
|
12% 190 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
|
20.1%
Poor
|
19% 24.5 fps
|
23% 28.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
46.5%
Average
|
56% 74.8 MB/s
|
75% 0.69 MB/s
| |
|
|
63.6%
Good
|
65% 88.3 MB/s
|
87% 0.86 MB/s
| |
|
|
51.5%
Above average
|
52% 70.8 MB/s
|
78% 0.82 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.1%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
23% 8.2 GB/s
|
61% 65.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A78LT-M Builds (Compare 76 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A78LT-M
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 9x |
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 9x |
| Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 8x |
| HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples | 6x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $203 |