HP 800-015eo

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	HP 800-015eo (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130719
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '17 at 15:49
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$127 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 442 58% 435 Pts	64-Core 423 26% 423 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% HP(103C 6889) 1.5GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 376.54 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 27.5 Parallax 30.8 20% 27.8 fps	MRender 35 Gravity 29.3 Splatting 25.5 24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB 11,312 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 516 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2982 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 126 (AE) Unknown 100 100 24 (B5) Unknown 100 100 7718086706483 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 93 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	48.8% Average	Read 417 Write 183 Mixed 261 63% 287 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 4.73 57% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 7.36 34% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: HP33 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 141874616 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6785 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 3673260 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5676 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2979 (B4) Unknown 100 100 266576841 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 79 65 387252245 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 37 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 25811 (C2) HDA temperature 21 40 55834574869 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	102% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 168 Mixed 172 132% 176 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.3 96% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 2,039 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 380GB free, PID a009 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 99.8 Write 98.7 Mixed 69.9 112% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.21 65% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 44%
DaneElec Z Mate 16GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 15GB free, PID 0000, Microsoft comfort mouse 6000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	7.72% Terrible	Read 26 Write 8.61 Mixed 11.8 17% 15.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.69 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.005 33% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.72% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 2x8GB 1,252 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 17 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 17.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 800-015eo Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: HP 800-015eo

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
PM830 128GBSamsungBench 61%, 13,767 samples	1x

RAM
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 5,493 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16