Asrock H97M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140729
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 14 '17 at 05:11
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 186
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 320
39% 301 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 120
Parallax 112
95% 116 fps
MRender 97.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 102
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OWC Mercury Electra 6G SSD 240GB
55GB free
Firmware: 609ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 498
Write 266
Mixed 340
81% 368 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 98.5
4K Mixed 19
119% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 47.7
75% 139 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 79%
Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
35GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 405
Mixed 413
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 47.2
176% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 363
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 106
138% 251 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
17GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
75.9% Very good
Read 266
Write 208
Mixed 216
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 41.3
146% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 49.6
68% 124 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 502
Write 317
Mixed 378
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 96
4K Mixed 21.1
119% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 19.4
57% 113 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 97%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
23GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 114
Write 119
Mixed 108
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.97
4K Mixed 0.28
119% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 100%
WDC WD10 EADS-65M2B1 1TB
180GB free, PID 070c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 40.7
Mixed 39.5
52% 39.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.26
73% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GBH1X04F1AA28-15 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 0118 4GBH1X04F1AA28-15 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.7
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97M Pro4 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $674
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback