Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '17 at 13:42
Run Duration408 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 800
84% 674 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
EVGA(3842 1470) 1.2GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 21.1
16% 23.4 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 15
Splatting 21.2
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 487
Write 263
Mixed 348
81% 366 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 14.5
94% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 15.3
85% 194 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 91%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
105GB free
Firmware: 000F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 484
Write 193
Mixed 281
70% 319 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 4.55
86% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.4
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 3.68
21% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 72%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 136GB
126GB free, PID 00ad, PNY 128Gb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 105
Write 30.2
Mixed 71.4
78% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.81
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.52
78% 2.49 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 38%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 128GB
82GB free, PID fa64, pny 128Gb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 187
Write 83.6
Mixed 27.1
100% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.31
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.07
26% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 8GB
3GB free, PID 005b, pny 8gb
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
6.84% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 4.36
Mixed 6.25
12% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.58
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.004
28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.84%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G4D30AEEA.K8FE 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 10.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 60.1
66% 60.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $664
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback