Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 25 '17 at 12:49
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 75.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 209 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 698 65% 542 Pts	64-Core 1,285 80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1375 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 75.2 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 89.8 61% 78.5 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 58 53% 65.1 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	191% Outstanding	Read 1,963 Write 891 Mixed 1,094 289% 1,316 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 39.7 167% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 201 DQ Mixed 53.8 72% 127 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 191% Great: 243%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 43GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 235160061 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 80590766342493 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 112 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 110 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 26 36 85901705242 (C2) HDA temperature 26 36 85901705242 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 235160061 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 235160061 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 235160061 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 742 (EA) Unknown 0 0 460 (F1) Unknown 0 0 460 (F2) Unknown 0 0 472 (F4) Unknown 100 100 2490388	58% Above average	Read 447 Write 116 Mixed 165 52% 242 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 16 98% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 85.4 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 30.3 43% 78.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 73%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Read 146 Write 129 Mixed 114 162% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.22 66% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 70%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 180GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 59.3 Write 57.2 Mixed 60.3 76% 59 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.32 56% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 33%
ST2000DM 001-9YN164 2TB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 74GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 144 Write 119 Mixed 96.1 147% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.26 51% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C DDR4 2x8GB 1,740 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (96^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	95.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 33.8 MC Mixed 30.6 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.1 SC Write 38.9 SC Mixed 26.8 85% 29.6 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)