| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte H110M-H |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161116 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 26 '17 at 14:04 |
| Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 51% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.1%
Good
|
66% 111 Pts
|
32% 238 Pts
|
16% 258 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1005 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
14% 17.3 fps
|
17% 20.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.7 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
41% 191 MB/s
|
54% 25 MB/s
|
28% 53 MB/s
|
|
|
94.4%
Outstanding
|
122% 162 MB/s
|
83% 0.88 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
81GB free, PID b207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
29.4%
Poor
|
76% 60 MB/s
|
56% 0.69 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown GLJF62F-D8KFF4------ 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.2%
Below average
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
23% 7.93 GB/s
|
51% 78 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,440 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 717x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 478x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 304x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 452x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 390x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 252x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $138 |