Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55D-M EVO (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100722
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '15 at 17:49
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 73.6 2-Core 139 49% 106 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 260 35% 260 Pts	64-Core 257 16% 257 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Zotac(19DA 2255) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5362 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 36.3 Parallax 45 30% 39.5 fps	MRender 50.7 Gravity 33.8 Splatting 37 33% 40.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 21288086 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 41540923704861 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1664 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 148 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 21288086 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 21288086 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 21288086 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15151 (EA) Unknown 0 0 13782 (F1) Unknown 0 0 13782 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16292	34.4% Below average	Read 195 Write 93.9 Mixed 115 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 47.9 4K Mixed 6.49 54% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 5.42 36% 83.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 61%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 183GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 184 181 1783 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14236 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22502 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2941 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 230 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 169 169 93534 (C2) HDA temperature 117 104 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	46% Average	Read 80 Write 80.5 Mixed 77.2 60% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.96 4K Mixed 0.22 64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 50%
Seagate ST96812AS 60GB 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 10GB free Firmware: 3.14 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3046172 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 15305 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 76 60 46226577 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12633 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3792 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 538837024 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2011 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 33 33 135590 (C2) HDA temperature 32 53 64424509472 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 70 46 128200768 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	13.1% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 13.6 Mixed 17.8 16% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.19 44% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 23%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 7GB free, PID 0c15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 23.2 Mixed 23.8 31% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.27 67% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 22%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55D-M EVO Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	21x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	14x
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	7x

SSD
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	4x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	28x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	19x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $518

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus P7H55D-M EVO

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)