Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '17 at 09:58
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Memory 72.2 1-Core 121 2-Core 240 79% 144 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 954 84% 715 Pts	64-Core 1,310 81% 1,310 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Gigabyte(1458 228F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	54.3% Above average	Lighting 66.4 Reflection 61.4 Parallax 83.1 54% 70.3 fps	MRender 60.7 Gravity 55.4 Splatting 79.1 55% 65.1 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43 14,860 User benchmarks, average bench 151% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FM02.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 2,121 Write 242 Mixed 466 201% 943 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 34.3 129% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 76.3 84% 142 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 210%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 648GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 185 185 30082335071 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3238 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18660 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1522 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3778 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3778 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 240519217189 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	80.8% Excellent	Read 153 Write 129 Mixed 133 104% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.21 80% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 608GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 72 (03) Spinup time 182 182 30084170061 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3164 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 24499 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1590 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 3873 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 3873 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 223339282467 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	74% Very good	Read 113 Write 145 Mixed 109 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.18 75% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 320GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 163 163 21489909996 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2585 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9942 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 979 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2852 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2852 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 214749478946 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	68.3% Good	Read 117 Write 121 Mixed 98.6 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.21 86% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 279GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 74 (03) Spinup time 138 138 12895060145 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1323 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18234 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1245 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1902 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1902 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 223339479077 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3	66.2% Good	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 106 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.17 65% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 107%
Maxtor 7Y250M0 250GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 233GB free Firmware: YAR511W0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 179 178 26389 (04) Start/Stop count 253 253 186 (05) Reallocated sector count 247 247 70 (06) Read channel margin 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 239 56006 (09) Power-on hours count 1 1 28238 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 253 253 187 (C0) Power-off retract count 253 253 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 253 253 50 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 253 252 1609 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 250 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 199 199 0 (C8) Write error rate 253 252 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 249 8 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 206 0 (CB) Run out cancel 253 252 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 253 247 0 (CD) Thermal asperity rate(TAR) 253 252 0 (CF) Spin high current 253 252 0 (D0) Spin buzz 253 252 0 (D1) Offline seek performance 192 192 0 (63) Unknown 253 253 0 (64) Unknown 253 253 0 (65) Unknown 253 253 0	33.5% Below average	Read 57.1 Write 59.2 Mixed 58.3 44% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.24 4K Mixed 0.51 124% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 89,024 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 24.8 MC Mixed 24.4 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 23 67% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 96.5 42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,066

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)