Lenovo LENOVO7484

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo LENOVO7484 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120507
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '17 at 12:32
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 76.5 1-Core 38 2-Core 74.3 42% 62.9 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 151 20% 151 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 1290) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.39% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 0.84 2% 2.85 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 3.57 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.39% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 02.03E02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 138 137 4066 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1775 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 17892 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1005 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 238 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1773 (C2) HDA temperature 98 92 45 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.6% Below average	Read 61.1 Write 76.7 Mixed 58 49% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.33 86% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 59%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1.5TB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 28.7 Mixed 30.4 39% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.24 34% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 74%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,268 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 516GB free, PID b206 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 27.4 Mixed 29.5 37% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.19 19% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 6.6 19% 6.5 GB/s	Latency 87.3 46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo LENOVO7484

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)