Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '17 at 08:54
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 132
59% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 441
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3120) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.2
Parallax 23.6
22% 24.1 fps
MRender 19.5
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 27.5
19% 22.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 413
Write 266
Mixed 269
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 3.81
57% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 1.78
35% 84.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 142
Write 167
Mixed 73
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 7.86
4K Mixed 0.47
219% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 79.3
Write 130
Mixed 56.3
66% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 7.75
4K Mixed 0.4
202% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
487GB free
Firmware: CC51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 119
Write 99
Mixed 93.7
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.81
4K Mixed 0.19
55% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
393GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 72.4
Write 96.6
Mixed 71.5
60% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.16
71% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 101%
ASMT 2105 8GB
2GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
Read 30.9
Write 28.1
Mixed 26.3
36% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.28
4K Write 7.18
4K Mixed 2.7
363% 5.72 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team--Elite-1333 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback