Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3P-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B250-HD3P
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3P-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1280x1024x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 15 '17 at 18:41
Run Duration	408 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$110 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Memory 93.4 1-Core 112 2-Core 220 82% 142 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 425 57% 426 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3733) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	36% Below average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 31.5 Parallax 38.8 38% 39 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 42.2 Splatting 36.7 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5943729 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 -55997783599530 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1037 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 204 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 33 45 55837524001 (C2) HDA temperature 33 45 55837524001 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5943729 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5943729 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5943729 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10050 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5947 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5947 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14196	49.9% Average	Read 424 Write 104 Mixed 149 49% 226 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 8.41 86% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 12.6 DQ Write 81.8 DQ Mixed 8.9 18% 34.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 75%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 161 161 34378285483 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2410 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2330 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 414 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2410 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2410 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 188980133924 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	100% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 176 Mixed 158 127% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.19 97% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 96GB free Firmware: CP100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5504 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12124 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14548 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4883 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 0 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 58 32 (C2) HDA temperature 142 112 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 87674 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 253 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	41% Average	Read 65 Write 77.7 Mixed 64.7 52% 69.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.31 79% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 140GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 33.5 Mixed 33.5 43% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.65 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.35 79% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 43%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 33 Mixed 12.6 33% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 9.15 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.2 41% 3.12 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15 1,780 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	6.74% Terrible	Read 22.9 Write 6.83 Mixed 10.1 14% 13.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.77 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.04 31% 2.62 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.74% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	84% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 33.4 MC Mixed 24.9 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 33.1 SC Mixed 24.3 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 61.2 65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B250-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B250-HD3P-CF

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	193x
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	123x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	102x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	108x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	28x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $276

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16