Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 218 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket AM2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 71.6 39% 58.8 Pts	4-Core 56.5 8-Core 76.4 8% 66.4 Pts	64-Core 75 5% 75 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150 477 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10C5) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.07% Terrible	Lighting 0.13 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.13 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.07% Great: 0%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: JB0O Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 75.4 Write 43.7 Mixed 37.2 39% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.47 4K Mixed 0.14 29% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 5 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.53 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16