Asus CG8250

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	Asus CG8250 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8250
Memory	8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110728
Uptime	5 Days
Run Date	Apr 17 '17 at 21:19
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$194 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 80.9 2-Core 155 63% 106 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 365 39% 309 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	29% Poor	Lighting 34 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 39 28% 34.8 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 35 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD320 256GB-$419 137 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.6.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 17180078 (05) Reallocated sector count 81 81 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 67912022888801 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2426 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 92 (B1) Unknown 0 0 2 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 46 106 42956619822 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 17180078 (C4) Reallocation count 81 81 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 17180078 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 17180078 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 21474836480 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11719 (EA) Unknown 0 0 9492 (F1) Unknown 0 0 9492 (F2) Unknown 0 0 15219	49.6% Average	Read 300 Write 219 Mixed 233 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 10.4 74% 31 MB/s	DQ Read 25.7 DQ Write 97.7 DQ Mixed 10.1 23% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 565GB free Firmware: JC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 211925429 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5668 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 132048519 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 5318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4181 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 60 50 689176616 (C2) HDA temperature 40 50 64424509480 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 27 211925429 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 43344809968990 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1120558832 (F2) Unknown 100 253 164603299	63% Good	Read 111 Write 108 Mixed 77.3 74% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.37 89% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D169DS3.16FE 2x8GB 1,803 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8250 Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus CG8250

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	84x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	18x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	17x
GeForce GT 530NvidiaBench 3%, 5,672 samples	16x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	7x

SSD
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	9x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	6x

RAM
EL63I1C1624ZV 2x4GBAdataBench 48%, 365 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 51%, 10,062 samples	5x
EL63I1C1624ZV EL63I1C1624ZV 16GBAdataBench 48%, 10 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $534

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16