ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	EVGA E685 0.0
Motherboard	EVGA EVGA E685
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130301
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 18 '17 at 04:36
Run Duration	426 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 102 2-Core 202 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 387 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3967) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.4% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 32.3 37% 39.1 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 44 Splatting 38.5 33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18575 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 238 (B1) Unknown 85 85 172 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 60 (F1) Unknown 99 99 95191955209	78.9% Very good	Read 504 Write 334 Mixed 162 73% 333 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 22.4 92% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 317 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 21.4 74% 166 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 118%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 5TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10581 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 346 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 2931 (0A) Spinup retry count 106 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 17 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2763 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 167504576543 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1820 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 626 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	111% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 195 Mixed 179 142% 189 MB/s	4K Read 1.54 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.28 138% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value	89.5% Excellent	Read 162 Write 150 Mixed 93.2 100% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.22 82% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 89.5% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 984GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 107 99 13284531 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2834 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 28 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 1231916675 (09) Power-on hours count 32 32 60171 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 6 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1133 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 128851443811 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 1975 (BE) vendor-specific 65 50 638910499 (C2) HDA temperature 35 50 42949672995 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 36 27 13284531 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 72065256319720 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1015667746 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3389661526	53.4% Above average	Read 89.6 Write 96.5 Mixed 89.8 69% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.32 92% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 70%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB 1,256 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	5.99% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 9.19 Mixed 12.3 16% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.92 4K Write 0.03 4K Mixed 0.04 21% 1.66 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.99% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB 1,004 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback