Asus X99-A

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus X99-A (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '17 at 06:21
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.8% Outstanding	Memory 97.3 1-Core 138 2-Core 278 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 528 8-Core 908 87% 718 Pts	64-Core 1,099 68% 1,099 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97.8% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8597) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.4% Very good	Lighting 87.9 Reflection 100 Parallax 86.7 72% 91.6 fps	MRender 94.7 Gravity 86.4 Splatting 90 74% 90.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 187GB free Firmware: BBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 5087399 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 43456479102603 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 371 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 38 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 21 43 64427327509 (C2) HDA temperature 21 43 64427327509 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 5087399 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 5087399 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 5087399 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 68719476736 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1857 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1932 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1932 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1104 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1179654	81.4% Excellent	Read 528 Write 244 Mixed 275 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 19.1 123% 50.3 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 61.5 90% 167 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 84%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250 40,327 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 150GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 2,103 Write 900 Mixed 1,119 301% 1,374 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 51.8 228% 88.7 MB/s	DQ Read 580 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 192 212% 363 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 243%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128M 128GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 75GB free Firmware: 0006 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5489 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1743 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 65 65 1782 (AE) Unknown 100 100 5 (B5) Unknown 100 100 9569230456350 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 241 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 65 65 35 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	37.4% Below average	Read 363 Write 111 Mixed 187 48% 220 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 4.64 4K Mixed 4.24 59% 14.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 763GB free Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 172 4283 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4452 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12299 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1842 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 295 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4156 (C2) HDA temperature 125 98 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.2% Good	Read 120 Write 103 Mixed 117 86% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.45 136% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234 3,507 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	127% Outstanding	MC Read 46 MC Write 56.4 MC Mixed 44.7 140% 49 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 23.3 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 49 82% 49 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	1,228x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	326x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	143x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	128x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	63x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GBCrucial $84Bench 97%, 1,914 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	32x
16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A1 2x8GBMicronBench 68%, 1,302 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $763

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16