Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results


Gaming 48% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Performance (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '17 at 09:56
Run Duration	234 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$52 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Memory 90.2 1-Core 111 2-Core 220 80% 141 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 421 56% 419 Pts	64-Core 417 26% 417 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% MSI(1462 3160) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 70.1 Parallax 68.6 57% 69.6 fps	MRender 71.9 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 55.5 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 53GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3501 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 659 (B1) Unknown 99 99 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 1 1 188749 (EB) Unknown 99 99 35 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5779067804	116% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 409 Mixed 421 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 46.9 4K Write 94.7 4K Mixed 48.2 183% 63.3 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 119 145% 256 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 124%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 94 8208450 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 50087908634571 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3056 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 54 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 129 545469300864 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8208450 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8208450 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8208450 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 10473 (EA) Unknown 0 0 10428 (F1) Unknown 0 0 10428 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17560	58.1% Above average	Read 440 Write 69.7 Mixed 113 44% 207 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 16 112% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 104 DQ Write 71.5 DQ Mixed 22.4 34% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 70%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 432GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 66 65 10534 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1316 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8691 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1323 (B5) Unknown 100 100 1572523 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 19 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 193274445848 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 614 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1341	18.5% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 36.8 Mixed 39.9 26% 34.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.79 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.49 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 72%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 330GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 181 5816 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4349 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15734 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4325 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 409 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4349 (C2) HDA temperature 121 96 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	38.5% Below average	Read 72.9 Write 61.1 Mixed 66.2 50% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.36 88% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 18GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 84 46812417 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4854 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 90 60 996942517 (09) Power-on hours count 73 73 24149 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4759 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 53 521535519 (C2) HDA temperature 31 47 68719476767 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 78 56 200905463 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.1% Below average	Read 51.4 Write 53.2 Mixed 55.4 40% 53.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.37 84% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 23,732 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 16.8 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 17.8 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 67 60% 67 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

CPU
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	65x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	63x
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	12x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $421

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16