Supermicro X9DR3-F

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DR3-F (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DR3-F
Memory	57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150709
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '17 at 00:41
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 85.3 2-Core 170 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 632 57% 479 Pts	64-Core 1,595 99% 1,595 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B37) CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.7% Average	Lighting 55.4 Reflection 64.8 Parallax 70.9 45% 63.7 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 54 Splatting 54 47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,588 Write 1,034 Mixed 1,163 280% 1,262 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 27.1 98% 31.1 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 64 71% 122 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 236%
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB 3,574 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 55GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3284888 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 43336220022503 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1904 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 648 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3284888 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 30 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3284888 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3284888 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 7177 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5901 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5901 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6279	47.7% Average	Read 438 Write 81.8 Mixed 130 47% 217 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 13.7 73% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 31.8 37% 63.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 70%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 736GB free Firmware: AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 221 163 3933 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5395 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15482 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3935 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 582 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 116 116 254367 (C2) HDA temperature 116 99 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 71 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.3% Good	Read 120 Write 94.7 Mixed 97.2 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 0.35 4K Mixed 0.19 53% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 67%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 13GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	3.4% Terrible	Read 14.3 Write 5.66 Mixed 4.78 9% 8.24 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.003 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.4% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0-C M393B5170FH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B517... 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	67.4% Good	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 26 MC Mixed 24.3 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.4 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DR3-F Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Supermicro X9DR3-F

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
WDS240G2G0A- 240GBWDCBench 42%, 495 samples	3x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70BH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 92%, 52 samples	6x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	3x
M393B2G70QH0- 16x16GBSamsungBench 99%, 14 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16