| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20161007 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 17 '17 at 12:38 |
| Run Duration | 100 Seconds |
| Run User | HRV-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.3%
Very good
|
79% 137 Pts
|
42% 310 Pts
|
19% 311 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5902) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4565
|
4.02%
Terrible
|
3% 4.32 fps
|
5% 6.24 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST380211AS 80GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAE Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
36% 48.1 MB/s
|
34% 0.28 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
41%
Average
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
61% 65.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV Builds (Compare 792 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV - $92
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 131x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 118x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 89x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 92x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 73x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 70x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $314 |