| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140604 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 19 '17 at 12:57 |
| Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
| Run User | NZL-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.3%
Good
|
65% 107 Pts
|
46% 383 Pts
|
30% 489 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7970-$435
AMD(1002 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.5.2
|
38.7%
Below average
|
41% 49.1 fps
|
34% 40.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
80.5%
Excellent
|
105% 472 MB/s
|
85% 31.8 MB/s
|
48% 106 MB/s
|
|
|
79.1%
Very good
|
101% 134 MB/s
|
137% 1.25 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.8%
Average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
56% 71 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
| FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $657 |