Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H170M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 22 '17 at 02:25
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4560-$31 70,054 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 109 2-Core 186 76% 128 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 296 39% 294 Pts	64-Core 293 18% 293 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Lighting 60.6 Reflection 64.5 Parallax 84 49% 69.7 fps	MRender 64.9 Gravity 56.9 Splatting 52.9 47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 19075359 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -127397319931685 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 426 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 101 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 19 33 42951835667 (C2) HDA temperature 19 33 42951835667 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 19075359 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 19075359 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 19075359 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 42949672961 (E9) Unknown 0 0 3765 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1913 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1913 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2320 (F4) Unknown 100 100 3276825	65.6% Good	Read 424 Write 119 Mixed 171 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 20.5 123% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 37.5 52% 95.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 283GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 15 (03) Spinup time 173 169 2308 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 692 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2138 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 611 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 34 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 657 (C2) HDA temperature 123 107 20 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	85.4% Excellent	Read 141 Write 156 Mixed 125 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 1.09 4K Write 2.56 4K Mixed 0.29 124% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 109%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 63GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 139 138 4033 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 944 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22428 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 322 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 854 (C2) HDA temperature 113 96 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.4% Average	Read 82.1 Write 79 Mixed 79 60% 80 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 2.74 4K Mixed 0.45 140% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Mushkin 99[2/7/4]191[F/T] 2x4GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	MC Read 25.2 MC Write 27 MC Mixed 21.9 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 21.7 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	321x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	280x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	140x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	136x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	73x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	58x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	43x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBCorsair $46Bench 69%, 47,721 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $701

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16