HP p6658uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6658uk (all builds)
Motherboard	FOXCONN 2AA9
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100907
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '17 at 11:26
Run Duration	322 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	86%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 830 1,495 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 74.2 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 71.3 42% 61.7 Pts	4-Core 84.8 8-Core 96 12% 90.4 Pts	64-Core 121 8% 121 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320 2,109 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 1917) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 6.38 Parallax 1.94 4% 4.26 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 3.57 3% 4.28 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: JPFOA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 122 122 149 (03) Spinup time 153 153 12893421737 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2749 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8439 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2745 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2752 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2752 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 171799281694 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 119593	34.2% Below average	Read 62.2 Write 57.1 Mixed 52.7 43% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.12 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.29 43% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 50%
Seagate Expansion 500GB 5,329 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 123GB free Firmware: 0502 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 24.6 Write 23.7 Mixed 25.6 19% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.65 4K Mixed 0.16 44% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 62%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270 9,828 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 46GB free Firmware: ML6OA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 101 (03) Spinup time 134 134 34386543002 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 12500 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 146 146 29 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 43189 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2365 (C0) Power-off retract count 90 90 12506 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 12506 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 171799281694 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 460296	38.9% Below average	Read 68.6 Write 66.9 Mixed 55.4 48% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.26 69% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 73%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 16GB free Firmware: MZ6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 144 144 82 (03) Spinup time 132 132 34386936223 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7765 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9673 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4858 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7781 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7781 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 188979675172 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 456	64.6% Good	Read 75.9 Write 149 Mixed 95.2 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.89 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.17 85% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 87%
Intenso External USB 3.0 1TB 614 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 63GB free, PID 0701 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 24.7 Mixed 18.4 29% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 1.26 4K Mixed 0.17 50% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT25664BA1339.D8FE CT25664BA1339.D8FE Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.1% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.9 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 92.1 43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6658uk

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)