Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	7.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '17 at 11:52
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 162 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 408 42% 339 Pts	64-Core 408 25% 408 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Lighting 31.4 Reflection 33.5 Parallax 40.8 26% 35.2 fps	MRender 29.7 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 38.7 26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37240G 240GB 1,026 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3F Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Read 359 Write 82.3 Mixed 92.3 38% 178 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 11 64% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1.85 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 0.53 11% 23 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 77%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 362GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 135 135 25788678416 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4498 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 15026 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3706 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4509 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4509 (C2) HDA temperature 127 127 292059021359 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88.8% Excellent	Read 177 Write 133 Mixed 26.5 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.18 92% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 322GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 26284 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 68 44 9979 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6148 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25842 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4212 (B5) Unknown 99 99 29309356 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2369 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 32 292058955821 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 1 1 62553 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6218	56.5% Above average	Read 85.8 Write 111 Mixed 29.9 55% 75.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 2.36 4K Mixed 0.3 90% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 72%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183 4,107 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 145GB free Firmware: CT100-10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 98 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 7744 (04) Start/Stop count 88 88 12662 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 50935 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3564 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 65536 (BC) Unknown 253 253 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 33 42 (C2) HDA temperature 112 37 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 68619 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 253 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 198 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	28.4% Poor	Read 48.9 Write 49.8 Mixed 37.2 34% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 42%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 72GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 144 140 3775 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3678 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 14739 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3663 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2799 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 880 (C2) HDA temperature 92 72 51 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 6 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.5% Below average	Read 65.2 Write 72.4 Mixed 50 47% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.34 89% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 10GB 21,027 User benchmarks, average bench 31% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	30% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 8.8 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	605x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	185x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16